Global LNG market could split if an EU carbon tax is imposed on imports

AGÊNCIA DE COMUNICAÇÃO Conteúdo de responsabilidade da empresa 21 de março de 2024

Wood Mackenzie

NEWS RELEASE

Global LNG market could split if an EU carbon tax is imposed on imports

Wood Mackenzie report says EU levies could create European price premium and transform LNG trade  

21 March 2024 The global liquefied natural gas (LNG) market could be transformed and potentially bifurcate if the European Union (EU) extends its carbon taxes to include LNG imports, according to the Wood Mackenzies latest Horizons report.

The EU has extended its Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) to shipping, meaning that LNG cargoes into Europe will be subject to a carbon tax from 2024. The report, titled Call of duties: How emission taxes on imports could transform the global LNG market concludes that if the trading bloc goes further and tightens it methane regulation or includes LNG in its Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) effectively placing an import duty on LNG at prevailing ETS carbon prices then Wood Mackenzie predicts that the global LNG market would split.

If the EU decides to apply these levies, then this will push European gas prices up but also bifurcate the global LNG market, creating a two-tier LNG market, says Massimo Di Odoardo, Vice President of Gas & LNG Research at Wood Mackenzie. If taxes were limited to the EU, or even extended to Japan and South Korea, trade flows would likely be optimised elsewhere to mitigate the impact.

LNG emissions under the microscope
The report states that the environmental credentials of LNG are under increasing scrutiny. Despite emitting about half the carbon dioxide (CO2) of coal when combusted, the LNG value chain remains highly carbon intensive and plagued by methane losses.

However, it adds that while LNG players are actively working to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) footprint of their projects, the reluctance from buyers to pay a premium for lower-emission LNG has so far curbed sellers appetite to commit to major investment to reduce carbon intensity.

US LNG one of worst performers
The report adds that not all LNG projects are equal. Measured in kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent (kg CO2e), methane accounts for 5% to 15% of overall carbon intensity in LNG projects outside the US. But for LNG projects in the US, methane can account for as much as 25% to 40%. This largely due to higher levels of methane losses caused by extensive use of pneumatic devices and compressors associated with shale gas production.

With a range of 800 to 1400 kilograms CO2 equivalent per tonne (CO2e/t) of LNG, the US has some of the worlds highest-emitting projects, with upstream reservoir type and pipeline distance to LNG plants adding to their high methane intensity, Di Odoardo says.

He adds thats projects with the lowest carbon emissions will gain from an import tax on emissions and targeting premium markets will boost trading profitability. However, proximity to premium markets will be key, with Qatar and Mozambique requiring high carbon prices to be lured away from proximate markets in emerging Asia, which are unlikely to introduce an import tax on emissions.

GHG emissions intensity (kg/CO equivalent) by region (wellhead to LNG loading point)

Source: Wood Mackenzie LNG Carbon Emissions Tool

High carbon taxes needed to decarbonise LNG
The reports analysis concludes that a tax on methane emissions of US$2800 per tonne (t/CH4), equivalent to US$100/t CO2e, will be effective in achieving its goal. Methane reduction remains the low-hanging fruit in emissions, with progress being made in different countries, supported by tightening domestic methane regulations.

Di Odoardo adds, A methane import tax will help provide additional economic incentives while limiting LNG price upside. In this scenario, exporting countries will also be encouraged to introduce domestic levies and retain taxed revenues.

However, Wood Mackenzie concludes that when it comes to overall carbon emissions, taxes imposed only in Europe will not achieve the required goal of large-scale decarbonisation of LNG projects globally and a bifurcate LNG market would be instead the most likely outcome.

If there is to be any material impact, a carbon price closer to US$200/t CO2e will be required for LNG imports, says Di Odoardo. Additionally, this would have to be introduced on a global level for it to be truly effective in reducing carbon intensity and that is unlikely to happen. For now, all eyes will be on Europe to see what it does next.

ENDS

Editors notes

About Horizons: The global LNG sector is complex and the market has had few regulations in terms of its greenhouse gas emissions. Wood Mackenzies Horizons report takes a deep dive into some of the potential scenarios if the EU decides to introduce carbon taxes on LNG imports and what these taxes mean for the worlds leading suppliers.

LNG Carbon Emissions Tool
For more information about Wood Mackenzies LNG Carbon Emissions Tool please click here.

For further information please contact Wood Mackenzies media relations team:

Kevin Baxter
+44 330 124 9400
Kevin.Baxter@woodmac.com

Mark Thomton
+1 630 881 6885
Mark.thomton@woodmac.com

Hla Myat Mon
+65 8533 8860
Hla.MyatMon@woodmac.com  

The Big Partnership (UK PR agency)
woodmac@bigpartnership.co.uk    

About Wood Mackenzie

Wood Mackenzie is the global insight business for renewables, energy and natural resources. Driven by data. Powered by people. In the middle of an energy revolution, businesses and governments need reliable and actionable insight to lead the transition to a sustainable future. Thats why we cover the entire supply chain with unparalleled breadth and depth, backed by over 50 years experience in natural resources. Today, our team of over 2,000 experts operate across 30 global locations, inspiring customers decisions through real-time analytics, consultancy, events and thought leadership. Together, we deliver the insight they need to separate risk from opportunity and make bold decisions when it matters most. For more information, visit woodmac.com.

A OESP nao e(sao) responsavel(is) por erros, incorrecoes, atrasos ou quaisquer decisoes tomadas por seus clientes com base nos Conteudos ora disponibilizados, bem como tais Conteudos nao representam a opiniao da OESP e sao de inteira responsabilidade da GlobeNewswire